Skip to main content
File #: WS-25-0768    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Agenda Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 11/10/2025 In control: Water Subcommittee
On agenda: 11/13/2025 Final action:
Title: Staff Request Water Subcommittee Review and Discuss Rialto Water Services' Outstanding Issues.
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

For Water Subcommittee Meeting November 13, 2025

TO:                                           Water Subcommittee Members

APPROVAL:                      Tanya Williams, City Manager

 

Title

Staff Request Water Subcommittee Review and Discuss Rialto Water Services’ Outstanding Issues.

 

Body

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Water Subcommittee Review Rialto Water Services’ Outstanding Issues.

 

BACKGROUND:

At the Water Subcommittee meeting on October 30, 2025, Committee members requested that a special meeting be scheduled for November 13, 2025, to review and discuss outstanding issues related to Rialto Water Services. In response, the Committee requested that an executive summary of the identified issues be prepared and presented for discussion at the upcoming special meeting. The topics cover a variety of subject areas.

 

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:

The following executive summary outlines the perspectives presented by RWS and includes details on staff’s positions as appropriate.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This section provides a summary of the outstanding issues, current status updates, and operational considerations related to the City’s Concession Agreement with Rialto Water Services (RWS). Staff has worked collaboratively with RWS and Veolia to identify areas requiring clarification, reconciliation, and procedural improvement.

 

1. Outstanding Issues

 

a. Maintenance Over $250 Billings - $441,348

 

Between Fiscal Years 2020 and 2023, Veolia did not submit certain invoices to Maher Accountancy (the City’s accounting consultant) for processing and billing to the City. Staff will work jointly with RWS, Veolia, and Maher Accountancy to review the identified costs, confirm completion of work, and verify that payments have not already been made. Upon confirmation, any legitimate unpaid amounts may be considered for inclusion in subsequent budget years as appropriate. City and RUA staff have proposed breaking out the outstanding payments into multiple budget years.

 

 

 

 

b. Labor Reset

 

The Concession Agreement (CA) requires a labor fixed fee adjustment every four years. The previous period concluded on December 31, 2024. Water Resources Economics, the City’s rate study consultant, has been retained to prepare a report establishing the labor cost basis for the next four-year period, retroactive to January 1, 2025.

RWS and City staff have agreed to hold a kickoff meeting in January 2026 with the consultant to initiate this process. RWS has previously confirmed agreement with this schedule.

 

c. Automated Meter Infrastructure (AMI) Project

 

The City Council approved a Final Capital Work Authorization (FCWA) for the AMI project on October 14, 2025, in the amount of approximately $8,000,000. RWS has been negotiating final contract terms with the selected contractor, USG, but as of the 10/30/2025 meeting the agreement had not been finalized.  At that meeting, the Water Sub Committee provided a recommendation to move forward with the second bidder on the list. RWS will provide a status update on current agreement negotiations.

 

The City has secured two grants requiring substantial project completion by the end of 2026. Previous procurements conducted by Veolia did not incorporate all required grant provisions and consequently had to be rebid. The City requires a detailed completion schedule demonstrating compliance with grant deadlines and conditions to ensure reimbursement eligibility.

 

Other important considerations:

                     Risk Transfer: RWS has requested that the City assume risks related to meeting grant completion deadlines.

                     Noteholder Approval: RWS has indicated that certain contract terms require noteholder approval; the rationale and timeline for this remain unclear.

                     Outstanding Costs: RWS/Veolia assert they are owed more than $750,000 for prior work. Staff has requested detailed cost documentation, including:

o                     The $350,000 included in the approved AMI FCWA to determine grant reimbursement eligibility.

o                     Additional prior expenditures exceeding $350,000, pending verification.

 

d. Battery Invoice and MicroGrid Project

 

RWS submitted an invoice for $67,000 in additional battery-related expenditures despite staff verification that no batteries were purchased or installed. This invoice has been rejected twice.

In February 2023, the City approved an FCWA totaling $3,167,063 for the MicroGrid project, which included:

1.                     Battery down payment - $794,412

2.                     Switchgear and transformer - $539,051

3.                     Vendor shop drawings - $720,000

4.                     60% design and Guaranteed Maximum Price preparation - $1,113,600

 

In June 2023, RWS requested an additional $3,818,262 for battery and substation work. Weeks later, AECOM and Veolia terminated the battery portion of the project, citing losses exceeding $700,000. The disposition of funds expended on the substation remains unclear.

 

Additionally, staff identified that a deposit made to Southern California Edison (SCE) for the battery project had not been returned. After staff engagement with SCE and the City’s consultant (Terra Verde), approximately $83,000 was successfully refunded.

 

RWS has alleged that the City halted the project in April 2023 following a meeting in Marina Del Rey. Staff has not found evidence supporting this statement. The City did, however, express concerns at that meeting regarding insufficient review by the Independent Engineer and subsequently retained an independent consultant to assist in project evaluation.

 

e. CAM10 - RWS Legal Bills for 218 Rate Process (2024)

 

A claim related to this issue has been filed with the City. As the matter is currently within the legal claims process, staff is unable to provide further comment at this time.

 

2. Current Status - Willow SSO (Sewer Overflow)

 

This item is currently in active litigation and will be addressed through appropriate legal channels.

 

3. Coordination with City Departments and SOP Development

 

                     Finance Department: RWS has requested a designated point of contact to streamline financial communication.

                     Public Works: RWS acknowledged significant improvement in coordination with Public Works and expressed a desire to continue strengthening this relationship.

                     Community Development: Discussions are underway to revise and update the Municipal Industrial Pretreatment Program (MIPP) regulatory framework.

 

4. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

 

At the October 29 meeting, City staff and RWS agreed to initiate joint meetings to develop the following SOPs:

                     Emergency Response

                     Utility Construction

                     Extraterritorial Service

 

 

 

5. Maintenance and CIP Thresholds

 

City staff and RWS will meet to evaluate and update expenditure thresholds for maintenance and Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). These thresholds, as defined in the Concession Agreement, determine how repairs and capital work are funded through the established trust accounts under the CA’s “waterfall” methodology. Adjustments may be implemented through formal Change Authorization Memorandums (CAMs) or similar mechanisms.

 

6. Offsite Reset Meeting

 

While staff agree that an off-site session would be beneficial for strategic discussions, it is recommended that such meetings be scheduled only after the most significant outstanding issues have been addressed and resolved.

 

7. Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Updates

 

RWS has requested improved communication and expedited processing for ongoing capital projects, including:

                     Well 3A

                     Sycamore Lift Station (Trunk Sewer Line)

                     Etiwanda Waterline Replacement

                     Pressure Reducing Valves

                     AMI Project

                     Septic-to-Sewer Conversions

                     CCTV Collection System Program

                     Niagara MIPP

                     Sevana

 

Project Initiation and Authorization

RWS has requested City staff to approve projects prior to City Council consideration through the FCWA process, indicating that it will not proceed without preliminary Project Initiation Memo (PIMM) approval. Staff has clarified that the CA does not authorize staff or the Subcommittee to approve projects prior to FCWA authorization by the City Council. The PIMM is intended solely as an early informational document for the Water Subcommittee’s review.

 

Conclusion

City staff continues to collaborate with RWS to resolve outstanding issues, ensure contractual compliance, and improve coordination on capital and operational matters. Staff will provide progress updates and recommendations to the Water Subcommittee as these efforts advance.

 

Representatives from RWS will be present for discussion and questions from the Water Subcommittee.

 

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Operating Budget Impact

There is no impact on the Operating Budget.

 

Capital Improvement Budget Impact

There is no impact on the Capital Improvement Budget.